Clinical Results
 
Imaging

General

  1. Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: Review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. RadioGraphics 2006; 26:641-657.

  2. Megibow AJ, Babb JS, Hecht EM, Cho JJ, et al. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2006; 238(1):87-95.

  3. Hara AK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: Preliminary comparison among CT Enterography, capsule endoscopy, small bowel follow-through, and ileoscopy. Radiology 2006; 238:128-134.

  4. Munechika H, Hiramatsu Y, et al. A prospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to iohexol in urography and computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:185-194.

  5. Wagner S, Breiteneder H. The latex-fruit syndrome. Biochemical Society Transactions 2002; 30(part 6):935-940.

  6. Neugut AL, Ghatak AT and Miller RL. Anaphylaxis in the United States: An investigation into its epidemiology. Archives of Internal Medicine 2001; 61(1):15-21.

  7. Perkin JE. The latex and food allergy connection. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2000; 100(11):1381-1384.

  8. Poley GE and Slater JE. Latex allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2000; 105(6):1054-1062.

  9. Reynolds KF. The CT spin: Training CT technologists to prevent extravasation of contrast media is crucial. Advance for Radiologic Science Professionals June 2000:1-2.

  10. Powell CC, Ming Li J, et al. A new device to limit extravasation during contrast-enhanced CT. AJR February 2000; 174:315-318.

  11. Birnbaum BA, Nelson RC, et al. Gastrointestinal imaging: Extravasation detection accessory: Clinical evaluation in 500 patients. Radiology 1999; 212(2):431-438.

  12. Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Blanco C, et al. Cross-reactions in the latex-fruit syndrome: A relevant role of chitinases but not of complex asparagine-linked glycans. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1999; 104(3 pt 1):681-687.

  13. Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Diaz-Perales A, et al. Isolation and characterization of major banana allergens: Identification as fruit class I chitinases. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 1999; 29(5):673-680.

  14. Tücke J, Posch A, Baur X, et al. Latex type I sensitization and allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: Evaluation of cross-reactivity to some foods. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 1999; 10(3):160-167.

  15. Kim KT, Hussain H. Prevalence of food allergy in 137 latex-allergic patients. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 1999; 20(2):95-97.

  16. Quagliano P, Vallarino L. Parameters affecting the precipitation of ionic iodinated contrast media. American Journal of Roentgenology (Published Abstract) 1999; 172:43.

  17. Apter S, Gayer G, et al. Urinary excretion of orally ingested gastrografin on CT. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23:297-300.

  18. Ridley LJ. Allergic reactions to oral iodinated contrast agents: Reactions to oral contrast. Australasian Radiology 1998; 42:114-117.

  19. Nelson RC, Anderson FA, et al. Technical developments: Contrast media extravasation during dynamic CT: Detection with an extravasation detection accessory. Radiology 1998; 209(3):837-843.

  20. Miller SH. Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution. AJR 1997; 168:959-961.

  21. Marik PE, Patel SY. Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast agent. AJR 1997; 168:1623-1624.

  22. Quagliano P, Austin, Jr R. Oral contrast agents for CT: A comparison of transit times and side effects. American Journal of Roentgenology (Published Abstract) 1997; 168:37.

  23. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, editors. Computed Tomography of the Gastrointestinal Tract. CV Mosby Company 1986.

  24. Carr DH, Banks LM. Comparison of barium and diatrizoate bowel labeling agents in computed tomography. The British Journal of Radiology 1985; 58:393-394.

  25. Chambers SE, Best JJK. A comparison of dilute barium and dilute water-soluble contrast in opacification of the bowel for abdominal computed tomography. Clinical Radiology 1984; 35:463-464.

  26. Nyman U, Dinnetz G, Andersson L. E-Z-CAT, an oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis 1984; 25:121-124.

  27. Nyman U, Dinnetz G, Anderson I. An oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis; 1984:25, Fasc. 2.

  28. Kivisaari L, Kormano M. A comparison of diatrizoate and barium sulfate bowel markers in clinical CT. Europ J Radiol 1982; 2:33-34.

  29. Megibow AJ, Bosniak MA. Dilute barium as a contrast agent for abdominal CT. AJR 1980; 134:1273-1274.

  30. Basu A, MD. The effect of compliance with oral contrast media protocols for abdominal CT on bowel opacification and diagnostic ability. European Journal of Radiology.

  31. Basu A, MD, Specialist Registrar; Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK: Personal Communication.



Back to Top